Jump to content

Chad

Members
  • Posts

    623
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Chad

  1. 1 minute ago, Kangaro said:

    But I think they dont have any proof only same nickname here and in game and its not enough proof if u will use lawyers they will be done cuz its not enough and they will must pay u more than that ban was worth :D

    5

    I'll assume that they only use the names to investigate the account. I'd be very surprised if they just handed out bans with zero evidence.

    • Like 2
  2. Name: Greyson

     

    Location: England, UK.

     

    What you do(work/school..):  Student

     

    Age: 21

     

    Languages: English and a little beyond basic French.

     

    Online for x hours a day: I'm online on the forums pretty much whenever I'm awake. A ballpark figure would be around 8 hours minimum.

     

    Experience with our products: I've used EFT since January, been a CS:GO RC tester since around July (had used it previously also) and I've been using Realm Royale since it came out.

     

    Relevant experience: Been a moderator/admin at various gaming communities throughout ArmA, Garry's Mod, GTA. My most relevant experience towards dealing with customers and a ticket system would have to be ESL. I was an ESL Admin in CS:GO for the female professional league, open leagues and open ladders. Although I mainly dealt with server reset requests I did have my fair share of technical issues and general queries.

     

    Why you think you would be good for this position: I've been around the community for a while now and I've got know most active members and moderators quite well and I'd like to think they know me well too. I'm already very active on the forums and Discord offering my help and assistance where I can, so I think I've demonstrated that I am capable of handling the role of a moderator position. I didn't come to Chod's hoping to become staff but the last 9 months here have been great. It does feel like a community, all the current staff and large majority of members are friendly and a great laugh to talk with, so if I could offer my time towards helping keep that, I will. 

     

    Anything else: Nothing at this time.

    • Like 2
  3. 23 minutes ago, Emiiru said:

    None of those games have a record of suing, blizzard and epic games does. Though activision is mostly just using their client to avoid fees.

    Yeah, they're active in the legal side of anti-cheating. I was fairly confident that Chod wouldn't make a BO4 cheat but according to CTON it isn't off to the table. I don't see it happening, though. EFT requires so much attention and given its popularity I wouldn't drop it.

    • Like 1
  4. Nice guide and I think people should take notice, but I really don't think "rage hackers" are the reason for downtime. It's just a lot of speculation. In "Banned in EFT? Post here" there are plenty of people who claimed to only use ESP and they're banned, so I don't see definitive proof that it's the rage hackers.

  5. I'm not sure what the TOS have to do with the ability to add a cheat? EFT, CSGO, Realm Royale all have TOS regarding the use of cheats and it's never stopped anyone from creating cheats before. Even suing cheat providers are very rare because within itself creating/selling cheats or breaking the TOS is not illegal. I've said many times that the law surrounding this is very arguable so there isn't a right or wrong answer - it's just what you can argue. 

     

    Short version: it's possible but I reckon it'll be trusted/VIP only if it happens.

    • Like 1
  6. I agree with Xpi - sort of. While I don't think anyone here can take the moral high ground because we're all in fact "cheating scum", I do think there is a difference between cheating and chargeback fraud. BSG isn't exactly a great company with great ethics etc. so I don't really care about how long EFT lasts. My advice is probably to not do it too much because eventually, PayPal is going to investigate it further and see what you're doing...Then it's RIP your account.

    • Like 1
  7. Just now, WeedsusChrist said:

    you have it backwards bro lmao. He complained that "my calculations aren't 100% correct", stating that my calculations are off by a couple hours. Namely, that I was off by one hour on my compensation time (71 hours vs his 72 hours lol). I'm merely stating that my compensation recieved was, in fact, 71 hours. NOT 72 hours. Im just replying to him.  Also it doesnt matter if you think this is pretentious. Just stating the facts here and putting it out there for those prospective chod cheesers

    It's a superficial time difference so who honestly cares over one hour. Some parts of your review aren't facts, either, they're just opinions. The "friends list" feature is perfect for raiding with friends" how's that a fact exactly? I disagree and think it's average so please edit to accommodate my feedback.

     

    1 minute ago, WeedsusChrist said:

    also this is like 2nd grade level math. if you think this is pretentious wait till you get to college, kid

    That's what makes it pretentious. You're acting like we couldn't do the simple calculations. You're literally just diving some numbers but thanks so much for showing the class you're capable of second-grade mathematics because I was beginning to worry.

  8. 22 minutes ago, WeedsusChrist said:

    @Faceless also, the compensation was 71 hours. My subscription expiration moved from November 1, 12:42 p.m to November 4 11:42 a.m. Thats 2 days and 23 hours. A.K.A 71 hours.. but nice try nitpicking a 60 minute difference

    Wouldn't that make you the nitpicker then? Since you're the one complaining about the difference and he's stating it? - regardless it's superficial. I've already said I find the statistical part of this review incredibly pretentious.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Guidelines.