7Skies

Anyway, cheating is just a new way of playing a game and I can say that a cheat is just for getting some extra information.
 

Some people use the cheat to ruin games.
Others, like me, use it to be able to have the advantage without destroying the servers / players.

When the people who tell me:
"Cheat is not good".

I answer them most of the time:
"If I give you a cheat, are you going to make me think you're not going to use it?"

And that's when the person realizes that cheating is just a new way of playing a game ^^

4 hours ago, Faceless said:

Thank you for the review. We are aware of the aimbot issues and try to make it better!

Thanks to you and the rest of the team for your work!

Notice for the options that I use all the time.

Aimbot: 4/10.

When I tested the imbot with the crosshair + a sight and that I aimed, the cross was not really in the middle of the sight of the sight, from there, I tested the whole with the mod "Predictions" and indeed, it is not famous .. at times I shoot completely next to the enemy while the lock is on it ...

Instant hit: 7/10

This option is terrible for bots .. Unfortunately less for gamers. Nonetheless, it is good overall.

No recoil + No spread: 10/10.

Very clearly, these two options make the coffee.

ESP (Wallhack): 10/10

Frankly great! The only thing missing is not being able to adjust the distance you can see players / bots.

Conclusion:

This cheat is good but there are some things that are wrong .. In particular the interface that I find a little "simple" and the options not sufficiently developed and added for the price we pay ... To see over time if it will be improved, for the moment I will stay with you.

PS: This is my humble opinion and I do not destroy the cheat and the work done by the dev's because I still use it myself.

This message is used for referencing opinions on the Deadside cheat and it is also intended for Developers in order to be able to improve the software / cheat.

Good cheat everyone.

10 minutes ago, Xpi said:

that is sooo wrong its sad to see ppl think this still, psilent client side(some client side will still lock to spectators but not you) wont show to a spectator but they can see your xhair isent on target but your hitting with every bullet and for dev's/ac's its easy to see in the log that your hitting even when your not on target.

 

sure psilent or silent aimbot whatever you prefere is great if the ppl specating you are dumb but anyone with a tiny bit of knowhow about the game will know whats up and as faceless said alot of games psilent wont even work in so its not just "make psilent cuz i like it" as it all depends on the game and more and more games are making sure you cant do it anymore.

 

few years ago(god iam getting old) psilent was a thing in dayz and every cheat on the market had it(not magic bullet but a true psilent) but as a server owner it was sooo easy to see when someone used it that i didnt even have to spectate them, logs was more then enough to ban them.

 

my point is, dont think that psilent in this day of age is such a great thing.

I understand your point of view and that of @Faceless , it was just an idea given like that ..

It would have really helped me on DeadSide for example because with the "HMR" sight it is impossible to use the Aimlock since it will always lock next to it.

It is in relation to these kinds of things that the pSilent could be good.

You are the dev's, not me so I'm not going to create a controversy and confusion over this, you do a good job and I appreciate your different points of view

1 hour ago, Faceless said:

psilent probably doesnt work for most games and i dont really see the benefit of client side silent aim.

The interesting side of the psilent is that when you are spec by a player or the administrative team of a game, it prevents them from seeing the aimbot lock and it makes it easier to kill.

looking more closely at the cheats, I noticed that some games did not have the "Silent aim" mode ..

Would it be possible in time with future updates to add this?

Ty and good cheating.